Choosing a reputable journal or publisher is an important part of the research process. While many open access journals publish high-quality, peer-reviewed scholarship, some publishers engage in deceptive, unethical, or unprofessional practices.
Use the guidance below when evaluating:
- Journals and publishers as potential publication venues
- Invitations to review manuscripts
- Invitations to join editorial boards
- Conference invitations
- Requests to publish your thesis
There is no single criterion that indicates whether or not a publication is reputable. Instead, look for a cumulative effect of more positives or more negatives. If you have additional questions, contact your liaison librarian.
Signs of a reputable journal or publisher
- Scope of the journal is well-defined and clearly stated
- Journal’s primary audience is researchers/practitioners
- The editor and editorial board members are recognized experts in the field
- Journal is affiliated with or sponsored by a reputable scholarly society, academic institution, or professional organization
- Published articles align with the journal's stated scope and disciplinary standards
- Author fees and publication charges are clearly stated and easy to find
- Articles have Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs)
- Journal clearly indicates rights for use and re-use of content at article level (e.g., through a Creative Commons license)
- Journal has a valid ISSN (International Standard Serial Number)
- Publisher is a member of Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
- Journal is registered in UlrichsWeb Global Serials Directory
- Journal is listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
- Journal is included in the library catalogue, subject databases, or indexes
Warning signs of predatory or questionable publishers
- Journal website is difficult to locate or identify
- Information about the publisher is missing or incomplete
- Author guidelines are unavailable
- Information about peer review or copyright is absent or unclear
- Journal scope statement is absent, vague, or extremely broad
- No information is provided about the publisher, or the information provided does not clearly indicate a relationship to a mission to disseminate research content
- The same authors appear repeatedly within the same issue
- Publisher has a negative reputation (e.g., documented examples in Chronicle of Higher Education, email lists, etc.)
- You receive frequent unsolicited emails requesting submissions
- The publisher falsely claims impact factors or indexing status, or describes itself as a "leading academic publisher" without evidence
- The publisher or journal title closely resembles that of a respected publisher, society, or journal in order to create confusion
- Articles appear to have been accepted with little or no peer review
Evaluating thesis publication offers
Be cautious when responding to unsolicited invitations to publish your thesis.
Before signing any agreement, consider the following questions:
- Is the editorial process clearly explained?
- Does the publication include peer review?
- Is the proposed publication timeline unusually short?
- Is there an editorial board, and are its members qualified scholars?
Further reading
- I Sold My Undergraduate Thesis to a Print Content Farm
- Mise en garde – Éditions Universitaires Européennes et Presses Académiques Francophones
Suspect the legitimacy of a publisher, journal, or conference?
If you receive an invitation or encounter a publication that raises concerns, take time to verify its legitimacy before responding.
Consult your liaison librarian
- Investigate the legitimacy of journals, publishers, and conferences
- Help identify potentially deceptive publishing practices
- Recommend reputable publication venues in your discipline
Seek advice from colleagues
Talk with researchers and subject experts in your field. Their experience can help you identify trustworthy publication opportunities and avoid problematic publishers.
Use evaluation tools and checklists
Consider using the following resources:
- Think. Check. Submit.
- Identifying Deceptive Publishers (University of Toronto)
- Grille d’évaluation à l’intention des bibliothécaires (français) (Le réseau de l'Université du Québec)
- Evaluating Journals for Publication (University of Waterloo)
- Retraction Watch Highjacked Journals Checker form
Thanks to Grand Valley State University for permission to adapt and reuse Open Access Journal Quality Indicators.