Extract from the Regulations Concerning the Investigation of Research Misconduct:
6. COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE ON RESEARCH MISCONDUCT
6.1 There shall be a Committee on Research Misconduct (the “Committee”) for the investigation of allegations of Research Misconduct referred to it by the RIO. The Committee shall consist of four (4) members:
(i) one (1) member of the University community with relevant knowledge and expertise appointed by the Vice-Principal (Research and International Relations) in consultation with the Dean;
(ii) one (1) external member who has no current affiliation with the University appointed by the Vice-Principal (Research and International Relations); and
(iii) two (2) members with relevant knowledge and expertise appointed by the Secretary-General from a panel of ten (10) established in accordance with the procedures set out at section 6.9.
6.2 In the event that a Respondent is a graduate student or postdoctoral fellow the Committee shall be comprised of five (5) members with the Dean of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, or delegate, serving as a fifth (5th) member.
6.3 In the event that the Respondent or Respondents hold appointment in, or are registered or affiliated with, two or more faculties, the Vice-Principal (Research and International Relations), in consultation with the Deans of the relevant faculties, shall consult and decide who shall serve as their appointee.
6.4 In the event of the recusal of a member of the Committee pursuant to section 6.8, the vacancy shall be filled in accordance with the above provisions.
6.5 The Committee when constituted shall select a chair from amongst its members. The chair shall have a casting vote if there is a tie in voting.
6.6 The RIO, shall take reasonable steps to ensure that the members of the Committee have no bias or conflict of interest with the Respondent, the Complainant, or the case in question.
6.7 The RIO shall determine if the Complainant has a legitimate and direct personal interest in the outcome of the investigation and, if so will notify the Complainant of the membership of the Committee.
6.8 Within three (3) working days of notification of the composition of the Committee, the appointment of any member of the Committee may be challenged for bias or conflict of interest by the Respondent or, where the Complainant has a legitimate and direct personal interest in the outcome of the investigation, the Complainant. The validity of a challenge shall be determined by the RIO, whose determination shall be final.
6.9 There shall be a panel of ten (10) members of the academic staff of acknowledged standing and expertise, appointed to staggered terms of office of three (3) years commencing on September 1st, as follows:
(i) Prior to the March 1st of each year, the Secretary-General shall request from the President of the McGill Association of University Teachers (M.A.U.T.) and the Principal a slate of names, consisting of at least twice the number of vacancies on the panel to be filled that year.
(ii) The slate of recommended names shall be submitted by the President of M.A.U.T. and the Principal to the Secretary-General for consideration by the Senate Nominating Committee. From this slate, the Senate Nominating Committee shall select the persons to recommend to Senate to fill the vacancies. Reasonable efforts shall be made to give due consideration to representation from different disciplines.
Professor Paul Clarke (Pharmacology and Therapeutics, MEDICINE) – 2019
Professor Jeffrey Myers (DENTISTRY) – 2019
Professor Catherine Potvin (Biology, SCIENCE) – 2019
Professor Silvia Vidal (Human Genetics, MEDICINE) – 2019
Professor Jacqueline Bede (Plant Science, FAES) – 2020
Professor Luke Martin McCaffrey (Oncology, MEDICINE) – 2020
Professor Nathan Hall (Educational and Counselling Psychology, EDUCATION) – 2020
Professor John Hanrahan (Physiology, MEDICINE) - 2021
Professor Hope Weiler (Dietetics and Human Nutrition, FAES) - 2021
Professor Claudia Mitchell (DISE, EDUCATION) - 2021
Secretary: Ms. Bonnie Borenstein