In-person class cancellation and work-from-home / Annulation des cours en présentiel et télétravail

Updated: Tue, 03/10/2026 - 17:14
In-person class cancellation and work-from-home / Annulation des cours en présentiel et télétravail. McGILL ALERT! Due to freezing rain all in-person classes and activities on Wednesday, March 11, will be cancelled. Staff are asked not to come to campus tomorrow unless they are required on site by their supervisor to perform necessary functions and activities. See your McGill email for more information.
...
ALERTE McGILL! En raison de la pluie verglaçante, tous les cours et activités en présentiel prévus pour le mercredi 11 mars sont annulés. Nous demandons au personnel de ne pas se présenter sur le campus demain, à moins que leur superviseur ne leur demande d’être sur place pour accomplir des fonctions ou activités nécessaires au fonctionnement du campus. Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter vos courriels de McGill.

Subscribe to the OSS Weekly Newsletter!

Cheating on the National

The news report emphasized that universities are not doing enough to curb cheating. Karen Pauls remarked that “There is no evidence that the universities are finding a formula to prevent it”. Maybe she didn’t listen to the 45 minute interview I gave the CBC, of which they selected only a few seconds of remarks.

On The National, Peter Mansbridge reported the results of a survey on cheating in Canadian universities.  Reference was made to data gathered from over 40 universities about the number of students found guilty of cheating.  The main point made was that universities are not doing enough to curb the “rampant” cheating that is taking place.  The evidence for this level of cheating came from other surveys that ask students if they have ever cheated.  The percentages are high, but there was no clarity on the frequency of the crime or whether it was committed in 4th grade or in university.

The news report emphasized that universities are not doing enough to curb cheating.  Karen Pauls remarked that “There is no evidence that the universities are finding a formula to prevent it”.  Maybe she didn’t listen to the 45 minute interview I gave the CBC, of which they selected only a few seconds of remarks.

I am not objecting to my limited air time so much as to the leaving out the key point that McGill is the only university in the world that has Senate-mandated regulations for multiple-choice tests requiring scrambled exam questions.  This has been the case for almost 24 years and has reduced this significant form of exam-copying to almost zero from a scientifically demonstrated 3-6% per large class before the 1990 regulations.  Other universities were urged during this interview to get the lead out and help level the playing field for the students and faculty by such measures.  The CBC fully blew it and provided a highly slanted report that seemed to justify the time put in to acquire the information but ignored the last 24 years of a very clean slate for this form of examination at McGill.

I have colleagues across the country who have either hoped for or tried to enable their own universities to establish clear rules about conducting exams (assigned seating and scrambled exams) but have not been successful.  The CBC had the right idea to tackle this issue but missed the key point that fully demonstrated techniques to improve the situation exist and are widely implemented at McGill.

Back to top