About the Miscarriage of Justice Review Process: The 696 CrC Application

How It Works

The Criminal Code of Canada provides a mechanism which allows individuals who believe they were wrongfully convicted to apply for review by the Miscarriage of Justice Review Commission (the “Commission”). Upon reviewing an application, the Comission does not decide whether an individual is guilty or not. Rather, they determine whether a miscarriage of justice may have occurred. If such is the case, the matter will be referred back to the courts if the Commission considers that it is in the interests of justice to do so.

What is a New Matter of Significance?

A new matter of significance is a matter not considered by the courts or previously considered by the Commission in an application in relation to the same finding or verdict, requires investigation, and does not raise only a question of law. For example, information confirming/establishing an alibi, another person’s confession to the crime, relevant scientific/forensic evidence, information contradicting testimony given at trial, proof of evidence not having been disclosed, etc.

Who Can Apply?

This process is available to individuals who have been found guilty of a crime or whose guilty plea has been accepted, who have been found to be a dangerous offender or long-term offender, or who have been the subject of a verdict of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder.

Typically, a 696 application can only be submitted when all other forms of appeal have been exhausted. However, the Commission may consider the reasons why the finding or verdict was not appealed to the court of appeal or the Supreme Court of Canada when assessing this criterion. 

Relevant Criminal Code Provisions

You may refer to sections 696.1 to 696.6 of the Criminal Code for more information. 

Notice

By virtue of the laws of the Quebec Bar Association (Loi sur le Barreau du Québec), Innocence McGill cannot represent you, nor act in your name nor provide legal advice. Innocence McGill's role is to study an applicant's file until such a time where the applicant is represented by a lawyer. It is not until this last step in the review process that Innocence McGill officially accepts both the application for assistance, and the obligation to work with the lawyer to continue the research and investigation required by the file. The members of Innocence McGill assure the confidentiality of all correspondence with the applicants but cannot guarantee the same protection as provided by attorney-client privilege.

Back to top