Table of Contents
Keywords: Symbiosis, Turgor Pressure, Fungi, Growth, Cell Structure, Morphology, Spores
Abstract
Fungi can be found in nearly every climate and habitat. They exhibit remarkable adaptability through diverse morphological and physiological strategies to overcome their lack of mobility. Fission yeast spores survive passage through fruit fly guts to reach nutrient-rich environments; yeast cells generate turgor pressure to penetrate rigid substrates; and the rod-shaped morphology of Schizosaccharomyces maximizes environmental access. Fungi also employ survival strategies like saprotrophy for nutrient recycling and mycorrhizal symbiosis for nutrient distribution, while parasitic fungi such as Ophiocordyceps Unilateralis exploit hosts. Higher fungi, including Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, have evolved complex fruiting bodies and spore dispersal mechanisms to improve reproductive success. For example, Bird’s Nest fungi employ a splash cup dispersal mechanism to spread their spores. These adaptations underscore fungi’s role as bioengineers, employing innovative strategies, from an individual to collective level, to persist all around the world.
Introduction
Fungi are eukaryotic heterotrophs characterized by a chitinous cell wall and lack of phagotrophic ability (Naranjo-Ortiz & Gabaldón, 2019). They are chemo-organotrophs who obtain energy from the catabolism of carbon sources, ranging from large polymers to simple sugars. The fungi’s unique digestive system allows them to lead a saprotrophic lifestyle, feasting on a variety of dead and decaying matter, while also enabling them to be predators, pathogens, and parasites (Kavanagh, 2005). This metabolic diversity enables a significant number of survival strategies. For instance, the white-rot fungus Pycnoporus cinnabarinus is capable of consuming lignin (Sigoillot et al., 2012), while the pathogenic Absidia corymbifera preys on compounds in the forestomachs of cattle (Chihaya et al., 1988).
Despite playing a critical role in the ecosystem, most fungi have limited mobility. Colonial fungi rely on vast networks to transport resources, and their movement largely consists of directional growth (Bielcik et al., 2019). Fungal colonies can spread over miles. For instance, the Armillaria bulbosa is considered one of the largest and oldest organisms alive. It occupies a minimum area of 37 hectares and weighs roughly 11 tons! If that wasn’t enough, the A. bulbosa has remained genetically stable for over 1500 years (Smith et al., 1992). Fungi also rely on complex reproductive cycles to further distribute their progeny and guarantee survival (Kavanagh, 2005).
It is suggested that fungi are amongst the first organisms to colonize land. Devonian fossil records (~400 mya) show organisms resembling four major groups of fungi: Blastocladiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Mucoromycota, and Ascomycotai (Nagy et al., 2017). Today, fungi exist in virtually every environment on earth. They have clearly shown their evolutionary resilience. This paper aims to discuss the plethora of design solutions that fungi have adapted to withstand environmental pressures.
Longevity and Survival of Fungi
While most organisms are protected from the environment by physical and physiological barriers, fungi have the unique characteristic of being highly dependent on their surroundings. Fungal diversity comes from their presence and survival in distinct places and the change in their behavior. An easily observed difference is the fungi’s shape, which is influenced by its growth behavior in particular environments. Fungi interact with their habitat through the relation between the surface for contact and the total mass of protoplasm, which inevitably impacts its growth, and more interestingly, its shape. Fungi exhibit a remarkable diversity of shapes, and these intricate structures serve purposes beyond mere aesthetics. They offer insights into the fungus’ habitat while providing various benefits. In this discussion, we will explore some fascinating fungi shapes and the reasons behind their unique forms.
Bird’s Nest Fungi
Also recognized as Nidulariaceae, these fungi adopt a miniature nest shape, the peridium, with egg-shaped and spore-bearing peridioles (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 for morphology). They belong to Agaricomycetes, most commonly referring to mushroom-forming groups of the fungi family. Despite their small size (1-3 mm), peridioles prompt an important question: what happens to them after dispersion from rain?
Fig. 1. Close-up photograph of Bird’s Nest fungi on organic substrate (Armstrong, 2021).
The fungus's peridioles are connected to the cups by elastic hyphae known as hapteron (H. J. Brodie, 1975). When rain hits the cup, peridioles containing basidiospores can be expelled up to seven feet. This process, known as the “splash cup dispersal mechanism,” occurs when the cyathus cup—also called the peridium—collects rainfall in its open mouth, triggering the ejection of the peridioles through osmotic pressure.The expulsion leads to the purse (a part of the peridioles as seen in Fig. 2 (A) bursting and releasing the internal funicular cord and basal hapteron. The adhesive hapteron sticks to objects close by, wrapping the peridiole around branches (Hassett, Fischer, Sugawara, Stolze-Rybczynski, & Money, 2013). As the peridiole dries up, it bursts, letting out spores that either drop to the ground or get transported by the wind. This dispersion method assists in reproduction and offers an understanding of the fungus's fruiting bodies, explaining why they are more abundant in rain-prone places.
Fig. 2. Morphology of the Cyathus striatus. (A) longitudinal section through peridioles of the fruiting body of Cyathus olla and stretched funicular cord with a sticky hapteron on one end and a peridiole on the other end. (B) Longitudinal section through a fructification of Cyathus striatus showing the splash cup distinctive shape. (Adapted from Armstrong, 2021).
Splash cups mechanisms are frequent in nature, occurring in fungi, lichens, liverworts, mosses, and seed plants (H. Brodie, 2011a, 2011b). They usually have conserved structures that mirror their dispersion mechanism. A typical splash-cup measures 5-8 mm in diameter at the opening, has a vase- or crucible- like shape, features sides angled at 60°-70° from the horizontal, and matures in an upright position (H. J. Brodie, 1956; see Fig. 2B).
Outside of their use of rainfall for reproduction, Bird’s nest fungi also have interesting decomposing properties which allows us to call them "saprotrophic" (Wicklow, Langie, Crabtree, & Detroy, 1984). Therefore, they have a significant impact on nutrient cycling and breaking down plant material (this topic will be further discussed in Fungi Chemistry).
Gilled Mushrooms
Produced by agaricomycetes fungi, gilled mushrooms provide an insight on how the specific arrangement of gills and their branching aspect can affect spore production. We can observe the different types of gills arrangement found in nature in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Different arrangements of gills. (A) Single array of gills in Marasmius rotula (Agaricales). (B) Primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary gills (lamellae and lamellulae) in Lactarius subplinthogalus (Russulales). (C) Forked gills in Cantharellus cibarius (Cantharellales). (Photographs taken by Michael Ku).
Gills achieve a maximum 20-fold increase in surface area for spore production, lower than the increase if lamellulae (short gills) were added to every second gill. This configuration does not seem common to fruiting bodies but is observed in gilled fungi with grown cap size (Fischer & Money, 2010). This seemingly contradictory phenomenon may be explained by a morphogenetic 'rule' in the developmental mechanisms of gilled agaricomycetes: gills placement are developed first and lamellulae are then grown in the remaining sufficient space (Moore, 1998). This morphogenic rule follows the concept of the symmetry breaking effect, which refers to the process where a uniform state becomes unstable and leads to the formation of structured patterns. In fungi, this effect can influence the development of gills and lamellulae by causing variations in growth rates and directions, leading to the observed patterns in gill formation. This symmetry breaking is crucial for creating the complex and efficient structures necessary for spore dispersal. In the case of gills pattern in fungi compared to fruiting bodies, the symmetry breaking effect takes place and adds the secondary gills when circumference, surface area, material, and many more characteristic conditions are met. The symmetry breaking concept has been perfected by fungi, a very ancient species, and can be observed anywhere (see Fig. 4 for an example of a symmetry breaking pattern). It will therefore be interesting to explore it in further detail in Fungi Math.
Fig. 4. Photograph showing a Ceriporus Squamosus (or Dryad’s saddle) in nature with visible patterns of symmetry breaking (Photographed by Edison Luke).
Hyphae Systems, Mechanical properties, and Relationship to Morphology
Hyphal networks exhibit several fascinating mechanical properties, specifically the relationship between compressive strength and stress strain behavior within hyphal systems. To explore this relationship, we need to introduce the notion of monomitic, dimitic, and trimitic fungi. These types vary in the presence of different hyphae. Monomitic systems only contain generative hyphae (green filaments in Fig. 5) responsible for growth and reproduction of the fungus. Dimitric systems add skeletal features (yellow filaments Fig. 5). Finally, trimitic systems also have ligative hyphae (purple filaments Fig. 5)(Porter & Naleway, 2022).
Fig. 5. Hyphal systems. (A) Monomitic hyphal system. (B) Dimitic hyphal system. (C) Trimitic hyphal system. (Porter & Naleway, 2022).
The progressive addition of hyphal types in Agaricomycetes Sporocarps appears to improve their macroscale mechanical properties, as both the compression modulus and the compressive strength increase from monomitic to dimitic to trimitic hyphal systems. This increase in mechanical resistance likely suits the specific environments of each type of sporocarp which promotes their long-term survival until reproduction (Porter & Naleway, 2022).
If a model were developed for the compression modulus and compressive strength of all sporocarps, as attempted by Porter and Naleway (2022), it would likely reveal that their strength and durability are strongly influenced by hyphal composition, structural support, and material properties. This concept suggests a link between the morphological changes in fungal fruit bodies and their physical properties. Adaptations in hyphal systems, pores, and overall material morphology of fungi are driven by the need to optimize physical properties, enhancing their survivability in various environments.
Furthermore, hydration significantly impacts the mechanical properties of sporocarps, with moisture content varying between species. Environmental fluctuations can alter these properties, affecting spore dispersal and germination. It seems increased mechanical resistance in dehydrated sporocarps during dry periods can enhance their survival, allowing for reproduction when conditions improve (Porter & Naleway, 2022). This marks the second time rain has been mentioned as a driver force for fungi growth. Rainfall enhances survivability and encourages spores’ dispersion as seen with Bird’s Nest fungi. Thus, the contribution of precipitation to the lifecycle of fungi is two-fold: high humidity contributes to dispersion, and it also triggers spore germinations.
Evolutionary Morphology in Agaricomycetes
Agaricomycetes display fascinating mechanical characteristics within their three hyphal systems: monomitic, dimitic, and trimitic. We have already noted some examples of agaricomycetes when mentioning sporocarps such as the bird’s nest fungus which are characterized by filamentous hyphae and chitinous cell walls (Money, 2008). They are also known to produce a diverse array of fruiting bodies (examples are seen in Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. Diversity of fruiting body morphologies in the Basidiomycota. (Courtesy of Dr Laszlo G. Nagy.) Examples of fruiting body morphologies are shown to illustrate the diversity of forms across the Agaricomycetes. (A to C) resupinate fruiting bodies. (D and E) pileate-sessile forms. (G and H) clavarioid/coralloid fruiting bodies. (I to K) pileate-stipitate fruiting bodies. (L to N) gasteroid fruiting bodies. (A) Cylindrobasidium evolvens. (B) Xylobolus frustulatus. (C) Antrodia malicola). (D) Trametes versicolor. (E) Piptoporus quercinus. (F) cyphelloid fruiting body of Schizophyllum commune. (G) Clavaria rosea. (H) Clavicorona pyxidata. (I) Coprinopsis cortinata. (J) Hygrocybe splendidissima. (K) Conocybe antracophila. (L) Scleroderma citrinum. (M) Geastrum saccatum. (N) Rhizopogon. (Virágh et al., 2022).
We are interested in the evolution of these fruiting bodies and the understanding of their morphology and phylogeny. By tracing the polyphyly and the hyphal patterns of agaricomycetes, we can trace their common ancestry and their belonging to this fungal family. For example, lentinoid fungi and polypores were deemed closely related before molecular advancements due to pores and lamellae organization similarities (seen in Fig. 7).
Fig. 7. Comparative Morphological Analysis of Mushroom Gill Structures. (A) Lentinus sensu stricto. (B) Polyporus arcularius. (C) Lentinus crinitus. (D) Lentinus tigrinus. (Hibbett, 2007).
Looking at these microscopic morphology pictures, we can distinguish the hymenophore transformations in the agaricoid genus Lentinus (Fig. 7 A) since Polyporus arcularius, a closely related and younger fungus, has angular, radially elongated pores (Fig. 7 B) as well as the difference in agaricoid form between L. crinitus and L. tigrinus. In fact, the latter has evolved to have a hymenophore covered by a layer of tissues from the margins of the lamellae (Fig. 7 D) while L. crinitus displays lamellulae of many heights without cross bridges (Fig. 7 C).
In other words, morphological characteristic similarities such as the type of hyphal systems (dimitic and amphimitic), and aspects of inamyloid basidiospores and hyphal pegs (smooth) hint at an evolutionary relationship between Lentinus fungi and some polypores. This similarity provides insight on morphological transformations undergone by agaricomycetes fungi, permitting the diverse array of fruit bodies. This is further verified by molecular research that groups both fungus types into a clade (Seelan et al., 2015).
Survival and Cell Morphogenesis
Earlier, we discussed the diversity of fungal fruiting body shapes and its implication on environmental adaptation. In this section, we will examine the survival strategies of fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces) on the cellular level. Furthermore, we will discuss the shape and growth of fungal cells using the S. pombe model.
Fission Yeast Spores
Sporulation is a survival strategy that allows yeast to persevere through starvation and being eaten by predators. Indeed, in normal conditions yeast reproduces by mitotic division. However, in a resource deficient environment and in the presence of cells of the opposite sex, Schizosaccharomyces can undergo sexual reproduction to form dormant spherical cells called spores. These spores are not meant to thrive but rather survive until conditions improve. This tenacity is largely made possible by the outer spore wall (OSW), which resists various environmental stresses. For instance, spores can survive heat shocks of up to 55℃ and prolonged exposure at 42℃ (Coluccio et al., 2008). They are also resilient to extremes of pH and high solute concentrations in the medium. Yet, the most surprising is the spores’ ability to survive the Drosophila gut. Researchers examined the percentage of survival of S. cerevisiae spores versus cells in their vegetative state after passage through the gut of the D. melanogaster. The flies were starved for 6 hours prior to the experiment and the cells were marked with a fluorescent protein that only glows in a living cell. Finally, the researchers examined the feces of the fruit flies and noted that an average of 87+/−14 % of spore cells and only 8+/−7 % of vegetative yeast cells survived the journey. The results for the S. pombe spores were less impressive but still considerable at 38+/−14% survival rate. More importantly, this resilience leads to a very efficient method of spore dispersal. Fission yeasts do not construct vast mycelium networks to spread, but they can travel vast distances in the gut of the fruit fly. Then, when the Drosophila lands on a food source to lay eggs, the fungus is introduced to a nutrient rich environment. Drosophila prefers to lay eggs on ripe sugar-rich fruit and yeast love sugar. This is an ingenious approach that allows the Schizosaccharomyces to find distant niches with favorable conditions where they can germinate and grow. Similarly, this process ensures greater genetic diversity by spreading the genes and promoting mating between geographically isolated yeasts (Coluccio et al., 2008).
Symmetry Breaking in Spore Cells
When conditions improve, the fission yeast spore cell can germinate and begin growth. In this process, the sphere begins to expand while a cluster of proteins called the polar cap wanders in a random pattern inside the cell (Fig. 8). The force generation for this expansion is provided by internal turgor pressure. When the cell detects a high surface growth rate in a particular region, the polar cap stabilizes and forms a growth site in this location. Then, the growth site begins to propagate outwards but cannot apply enough local strain to puncture the OSW until the spore has roughly doubled in volume (Fig. 9). Finally, when the OSW undergoes its threshold strain, the expansion at the growth site yields enough local strain to rupture the outer spore wall. Given that the elastic modulus of the OSW is roughly 3.2 times that of the inner cell wall, high internal turgor pressure is critical for OSW rupture and outgrowth (Bonazzi et al., 2014).
Fig. 8. Time lapse of spore growth and rupture; white arrows indicate the location of the polar cap (Bonazzi et al., 2014).
Fig. 9. Volume of spores at rupture vs. initial volume after germination (Bonazzi et al., 2014).
Tip Growth
Following rupture, the cell expands via the mechanism of “tip growth” in which cell wall material is deposited to the tips of the cell and mechanical work from turgor pressure contributes to the deformation of the wall and the subsequent elongation of the cell. It is predicted that the cell wall material is viscous when deposited at the tip and hardens as it moves to the sides. This growth can be modeled as a viscoplastic process in which the cell reaches a critical pressure and deforms irreversibly due to the threshold strain from internal pressure. Researchers conducted experiments to show the importance of turgor for tip growth. Firstly, normal S. pombe cells have complex osmolarity regulation mechanisms which primarily depend on the synthesis of intracellular glycerol catalyzed by the gpd1 enzyme. Thus, the researchers created mutants with non-functional gpd1s. Then, mutant and wild-type cells were placed in substrates with 0.05M and 0.2M of sorbitol and their growth and force output was observed. The cells with defective osmolarity regulation grew significantly slower than wild type cells and even stopped growing at 0.2M sorbitol. Hence, the researchers concluded that the growth rate of the cell, v0, is proportional to the strain that exceeds the critical strain. This relationship can be modeled by:
Where P is the total internal turgor pressure, Pc is the threshold pressure, and Ecw is the Young’s Modulus of the cell wall (Minc et al., 2009). However, older studies discuss that turgor may not be the only force responsible for growth. The actin cytoskeleton plays a critical role in force generation in animal cells, suggesting it might also contribute significantly to expansion during tip growth (Money, 1997). Researchers examined this possibility by studying fission yeast cells that lacked functional actin cables. The results showed that these cells do not exhibit any noticeable difference in growth rate compared to wild-type cells. Therefore, turgor appears to be the only notable property responsible for force production and growth in S. pombe (Minc et al., 2009). In fact, turgor produces a surprising amount of internal pressure of roughly 1.5 MPa (1.5 atm) which is similar to the internal pressure of a steam engine. Likewise, the force required to stall tip growth is estimated to be 1 μN/μm2 which a human could achieve by supporting hundreds of kilograms with their hand. This force allows fungal cells to pierce objects in their environment and grow despite rigid substrates. (Chang, 2017).
Benefits of Rod Shape
But why go through all that trouble to be a rod? Firstly, although the surface area to volume ratio of a spherical cell (such as animal cells) is greater than other shapes, the rod’s ratio remains nearly constant as it grows. This property allows the fission yeast cell to experience the same access to the environment regardless of length. Secondly, the rod shape contributes to an inherent break of symmetry allowing the cell to concentrate molecules at specific locations. For example, proteins and structures required for growth can be localized to the ends of the cell yielding more optimal organization. In the same manner, the rod shape makes cell division easier by automatically defining a transverse axis helping establish a mid-plane in the cell where genetic material and structures can gather. Finally, growing a rod-like cell is simply easier given that material can be deposited to only the tips and turgor can do the rest of the work (Chang and Huang, 2014).
Fungal Interactions with the Environment
With millions of species of fungi having adapted to their environmental niches, fungi unsurprisingly display mesmerizing ways in how they interact with their environment to survive. For example, the fungus Leucoagaricus Gongylophorus consumes around 50,000 leaves a day, but even more fascinating is that it uses leaf-cutter ants to bring leaves to it. Or the well-known Ophiocordyceps Unilateralis, colloquially called the “Zombie Ant Fungus” digests its ant hosts from within to grow and spread. While some fungi utilize beautifully complex systems and other fungi use simple methods to survive and grow, fungi have key interactions with their respective environments, whether it be with an individual host or a whole ecosystem.
Saprotrophic Interactions
If it weren't for fungi, the earth would be covered with the corpses of dead trees. Fortunately, around 300 million years ago, an adaptation in the Basidiomycetes fungi clade gave rise to the most efficient wood decayers, the Agaricomycetes (Eastwood, 2014). In fact, fungi are the primary decay agents of organic material (Bahram and Netherway, 2021), playing a central role in the carbon cycle as well as the recycling of nutrients throughout ecosystems. Without their pivotal role as decomposers, nutrients would be unable to return to their ecosystems, and the resource pool would quickly become exhausted (McDougall et al. 2021).
One of fungi’s most well-known saprotrophic interactions, or interactions regarding extracellular digestion of organic materials, is with wood. Wood cell walls are composed of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose polymers, all of which are insoluble in water (McDougall et al, 2021). This composition gives wood resistance to degradation. However, multiple species of fungi use wood as a niche, realizing their nutrition from this otherwise undegradable resource. Three broad classes of wood-decay fungi, or rot, have been identified by their different strategies for consuming wood: Brown rot, White rot, and Soft rot (Tatum, 2024). Brown rot consumes cellulose, the polymer that forms the skeleton of wood cell walls, vastly reducing wood-cell volume as well as turning the wood into a dry, powdery surface. White rot instead consumes the lignin in wood, making the wood soft and turning the wood white in the process. Finally, soft rot burrows voids into woods with high water and low lignin contents (Tatum, 2024). The fungal decay of organic materials also has significant structural consequences for the material. In tests performed by (Wilcox, 1978), strength loss in wood with fungal decay could decrease by 85% from a 10% consumption of mass. Even with mass loss of just 1-2%, the elastic modulus of wood exposed to brown rot could decrease by 50%. Specifically, brown rot would decrease the longitudinal modulus of elasticity and stiffness of wood by 30-40% over decay periods. Moreover, brown rot decay caused decreases in transverse stiffness that were significantly more severe, with up to 70% decreases in transverse stiffness.
Virtually all fungi digest their respective foods extracellularly (Malloch, 2021), and brown rot is no different. To start the decay process, brown rot fungi secrete hydroxyls and oxalates, or unstable compounds that easily damage cells. These break apart densely packed lignin-cellulose chains, providing fungi access to wood constituents. Brown rot then releases even more enzymes which break these wood constituents further into simple sugars and other nutrients. Brown Rot hyphae are then able to absorb these nutrients from the decayed wood, allowing a colony to grow, reproduce, and spread more spores to repeat the cycle once again (Tatum, 2024).
Fig. 10. Meruliporia incrassata, the most common form of Brown Rot in Southeast United States (Tatum, 2024).
While decay and rot often seem like a nuisance, the importance behind saprotrophic fungi cannot be understated. Using clever strategies to digest organic matter such as by releasing volatile compounds to break down biopolymers, fungi return nutrients and minerals back into their environment, allowing the cycle of life to continue. Without a doubt, saprotrophic fungi play a vital role in sustaining life by preventing environments from drying out and becoming barren.
Fungal Symbiosis
While most fungi feast on the corpses of other organisms, other species of fungi find that their best means of survival and growth is through symbiosis. In other words, fungi benefit from forming close prolonged associations with other organisms, often to the benefit of both species. Similarly with saprotrophic fungi, without the symbiotic relationship fungi have with other organisms, the world would be incredibly different. For example, Mycorrhizae are fungi that form symbiotic relationships with 90% of all plant species around the world (Dun et al, 2017)! Mycorrhizae benefits plants by providing them greater access to nutrients such as carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and zinc, while the fungus receives sugars and water in return (Dun et al, 2017). Another commonly found example of fungal symbiosis are lichens which are symbiotic relationships formed between fungi and algae or cyanobacteria. Lichens form the cornerstone of many environments, serving as food for animals, providing habitats, and protecting ecosystems from erosion. Fungi symbiosis is found everywhere around the world, usually playing a critical role in the maintenance of the surrounding environment.
One of Mycorrhiza’s most fascinating phenomena is the Common Mycorrhizal Network (CMN) or more colloquially known as the “Wood Wide Web” (Fig. 11). The CMN is an extensive hyphal network that connects whole plant communities, providing horizontal communication and transfer of nutrients. Mycorrhiza starts the formation of this web first by colonizing a host plant. Then, the fungus reaches other neighboring plants regardless of species. These networks can span extensively, but even more fascinating is that it is believed plant species can communicate and interact with each other through CMNs (Figueiredo, 2021). There exist many theories behind why fungi invest in CMNs. Normally, it would not make sense for fungi to give up valuable resources such as carbon. Figueiredo (2021) hypothesizes this occurs as a mechanism for fungi to keep its host plants alive. Nitrogen related compounds and water are similarly transported from plant-to-plant with mycorrhiza acting as a conduit. Alternatively, Beiler et al. (2015) suggest these networks act transactionally, finding that fungus that delivered phosphorus to its hosts received more carbon to grow.
Fig. 11. A representation of a common mycorrhizal network with trees in a 30m-by-30m plot of land (Beiler et al., 2015).
Depending on the substrates being transported, there are a couple mechanisms behind how CMNs transport materials. Transport of water throughout CMNs primarily uses osmosis. Water is hydraulically lifted through taproots of plants from mycorrhizal networks. For other substrates, such as Carbon and other nutrients, direct hyphal pathways are constructed for advective mass flow; that is, bulk transport of materials through a fluid (Beiler et al., 2015). The advective mass flow is driven by concentration gradients formed by differences in nutrient saturation in plants, particularly for long range substrate transfer. The mechanisms of diffusion and active transport also play a role in the transportation of materials, most notably when the fungal network is expanding (Beiler et al., 2015). Due to the complexity of CMNs, the mechanics behind substrate transport between fungi and plants depend on context, such as host stress, mycorrhizal interactions with its host, and soil environment factors (Beiler et al., 2015).
Parasitism and Predation
While fungi are often essential to the environment through saprotrophic or symbiotic interactions, some fungi harm, manipulate, or even kill other organisms in order to survive. Perhaps the most well-known case of parasitic fungi is Ophiocordyceps Unilateralis, also known as the “Zombie Ant Fungus”. O. Unilateralis spores attach to a carpenter ant’s exoskeleton and eventually penetrate it by germinating infective hyphae (Petruzzello, 2024). Once inside, O. Unilateralis slowly manipulates the ant’s behavior. As infection progresses, the ant is compelled to leave its nest to find a place most suitable for fungal reproduction. These spots are typically warm and humid locations near the ground, perfect places for the fungus to grow and eventually disperse onto future unsuspecting ants. Infected ants seek these places out, and when a suitable plant is found, the ant sinks its jaws into a leaf vein. As the ant dies, the fungus digests the ant from the inside-out and sprouts a stalk out of the ant’s head. Once mature, the fungus is ready to disperse its spores (Petruzzello, 2024).
.
Fig. 12. Ophiocordyceps Unilateralis sprouting from a dead ant (Petruzzello, 2024).
In addition to parasitism, fungi can also directly kill other organisms to secure nutrition. Some fungi, such as the Oyster Mushroom of genus Pleurotus, use their hyphae to trap microorganisms such as amoebas, nematodes, and rotifers (Alexopoulos et al., 2024). The oyster mushroom will secrete adhesive compounds over its hyphae, ensnaring any nematodes that pass by. Once a nematode is caught, a penetration tube, called a haustorium, grows out of a hypha, and penetrates the host’s body, further trapping if not outright killing the nematode. The haustorium then secretes more enzymes that kill and digest the animal. Other methods of fungal traps include the incredible ring-like traps constructed by some species of Arthrobotrys fungus. Arthrobotrys Oligospora is normally a saprotrophic fungus, feasting only on dead organic matter (Gurudev, 2023). However, in the presence of nematodes, A. Oligospora becomes predatory. Its mycelia form several rings just large enough for a nematode to pass through. When a nematode passes through a ring, the cells that make up the ring rapidly swell, trapping the worm. From there, a hypha grows out of a ring structure, and punctures and branches inside the worm’s body, killing it (Gurudev, 2023). Predatory fungi utilize simple yet remarkable traps to survive and thrive.
Fig. 13. An Arthrobotrys Oligospora ensnaring nematodes using ring-structure traps (Gurudev, 2023).
Fungal Penetration
A common mechanism that parasitic and predatory fungi use is the invasion of plant organisms, as demonstrated by O. unilateralis, Pleurotus, and A. Oligospora. Invasion processes often rely on a cocktail of cell-wall degrading enzymes, phytotoxic proteins, and metabolites, as well as mechanical pressures, often leveraged by specialized invasion organs, such as penetration hyphae and haustoria (Müller et al., 2024). With the incredible variety of pathogenic fungi, there is an equally large variety of strategies that fungi use to invade host cells (Money, 1998).
In almost all fungal-plant diseases, host penetration occurs using sharp hyphal structures that emerge from the mycelium, or other specialized penetration organs (Money, 1998). Fungal penetration starts with the generation of expansive forces that push against their surroundings. Once a fungal cell encounters a host cell, osmotic-generated turgor pressure provides the mechanical force to puncture host cells. This is done in conjunction with the phytotoxic chemical cocktail being secreted. Using the generated turgor, invasive structures can overcome the mechanical resistance of a plant cell and other substrates especially after the plant cell walls have been weakened by the chemical cocktail. The mechanical force produced by turgor pressure is very significant. According to Muller et al., (2024), maximal generated pressure, such as in the fungus Botrytis can reach upwards of 40 bar. Even so, fungal cells rarely reach the maximal amount of pressure they can generate. Despite the pressure that can be generated by turgor, this amount is not equal to the actual pressure (force per unit area) that is exerted against a host surface. This is because force cannot be delivered onto the plant cell wall without the fungal cell wall yielding. Therefore, the actual pressure exerted depends on the difference between the turgor generated by the fungus and the critical pressure required for the plant cell wall to yield, with the critical pressure referred to as the“yield threshold” (Money, 1998) . A simplified yield threshold model can be determined using the following equation:
Where Finv is the invasive force, a hypha uses to drive through a substrate, Ψp is the turgor pressure, Pcs is the pressure exerted by the cytoskeleton, Y is the yield threshold, and A is the surface area of the fungus’ invasive structure, or fungal apex. From this model, we obtain the following graph:
Fig. 14. The relationship between hyphal turgor pressure and invasive force generated (Money, 1998).
The model shows that the invasive force generated can be increased by an increase in turgor, cytoskeletal expansion, decrease in yield threshold, or an increase in the fungal apex (Money, 1998). Thus, modifying the above parameters in ways that increase invasive forces results in a more efficient penetration of a host cell.
While turgor pressure may be the leading generator of invasive force, the actin cytoskeleton also plays an important role in fungal penetration. Although the cytoskeleton offers little in terms of generating pressure, since any force its stiffness can generate being magnitudes lower than turgor (Bronkhorst et al., 2022), it is hypothesized that some species of fungi, such as Phytophthora use actin filaments on their hyphal tips to sense and react to mechanical stress, commonly called the “actin mechanostat” (Müller et al., 2024; Bronkhorst et al., 2022) . The mechanostat then contributes to host invasion by directing turgor towards a penetration site. In M. Oryzae, the fungus forms an actin network at the base of an appressorium, a specialized penetration organ, from which a penetration structure emerges. This structure can then channel osmotic pressure to generate and apply physical force (Müller et al., 2024). Botrytis employs a similar strategy with its cytoskeleton. In Botrytis, actin forms a semi to fully circular assembly during appressorium formation, which leads to a penetrating structure being formed (Müller et al., 2024).
Fig. 15. Fluorescent imaging of the cytoskeleton in a hyphal tip and an appressorium (Müller et al., 2024).
While actin filaments have little mechanical role in the invasion of host cells, actin can act as a scaffold to shape the structure of an invading hyphal tip (Bronkhorst et al., 2022). It is hypothesized that actin structures in the hyphal tip adapt to local and instantaneous mechanical stresses. Depending on the mechanical stress encountered, the cytoskeleton adapts maintain a constant hyphal tip sharpness to increase mechanical forces applied to a host cell (Bronkhorst et al., 2022).
Overall, fungi penetration heavily depends on turgor pressure, with support from cytoskeletal structures, in the goal of invading host cells. Turgor pressure dominates the invasion process, playing the main role in generating invasive force, while the cytoskeleton works as both a mechanical force probe and an adaptive structure during host cell penetration. Using these mechanisms, phytopathogenic fungus can extract nutrients from its host, overcoming its barriers in being a sessile organism.
Spore Dispersal
Within fungi, there are two groups whose life cycle includes large spore dispersal structures: Basidiomycota and Ascomycota (Roper & Seminara, 2019). Basidiomycota relies on the Buller’s drop mechanism, where the momentum of a fluid droplet is transferred to a spore capsule. This adaptation enables the growth of superstructures such as the gills of Agaricomycetes.
The coalescence of two condensing water droplets at its base launches the ballistospore. This mechanism has been likened to a surface tension catapult (Pringle et al., 2005). Sugars and polyhydric alcohols lining the surface of Ballistospores drive water condensation on the spore surface by lowering its water potential, enabling the accumulation of water (Noblin et al., 2009). This can be explained by molecular kinetics. Liquid water is in equilibrium with water vapor in the air. The formation of hydration shells increases the number of water molecules that cannot escape the mass. As a result, joining the water body is favored.
The Buller’s drop, for which the mechanism is named, is located at the base of the spore. The adaxial drop is located on the side of the spore. As the water droplets reach critical mass, they touch and combine to form a single droplet.
Fig. 16. The dominance of the tangential forces generated over the normal forces, causing ballistospore propulsion perpendicular to the surface (Liu et al., 2017).
Advances in high-speed camera technology and computer modeling have provided insight into ballistospore launch mechanisms, particularly in momentum generation and direction of travel. The launch can be broken down into two steps: drop coalescence converts surface tension to kinetic energy, generating an initial velocity, and the partial transfer of the fluid’s momentum to the spore. Fascinatingly, it is the asymmetry of the droplet’s placement and the shape of the resulting droplet spore complex that leads to the tangential force on the spore, causing it to fire away from the sterigma, making the analogy of a cannon more accurate than that of a catapult (Liu et al., 2017).
The resulting shift in mass propels the spore body, enabling it to break away from the sterigma, the super structure that suspends the sticky spores above the gill body (Moore, 1998). This mechanism enables the tight packing of spores, which after a brief acceleration, are slowed and fall perpendicularly away from the gill (Iapichino et al., 2021).
Fig. 17. Packing of Ballistospores within gilled mushrooms at various magnification (Lapichino et al., 2021).
The coprophilous fungal genus Ascobolus demonstrates another spore dispersal mechanism. Thriving in the partially digested dung of herbivores, Ascobolus fruiting bodies distribute spores on the surrounding vegetation. Ascobolus spores are resistant to digestion, and their germination is triggered at 37 °C. After activation and excretion by the animal, they quickly take advantage of the nutrient-rich environment (Lamb, 2001). A more gruesome variation: Ophiocordyceps uses the host's nutrients to grow a fruiting body high above the ground. This structure releases spores into the environment, ensuring the continuation of its infectious lifecycle (Becker et al.).
Fig. 18. Ophiocordyceps camponoti-rufipedis emerging from prey Camponotus rufipes, the red-legged ant. (A) Branching fruiting with cushion structures. (B) Cushions supporting spore eruption regions. (C) Section of cushion showing ascomata, small fruiting bodies. (D) Collection of high-pressure hyphae, asci. (E) Asci containing needle-shaped spores. (Evans et al., 2011).
These fungi both rely on the same adaptation of the division Ascomycota. The genus takes its name from asci, a variety of spore-containing hyphae. At maturity, the turgor pressure within the asci climbs until a critical pressure is reached, causing a hole to open at the fungus’ apex allowing spores to burst forth (Roper et al., 2008).
Fig. 19. Single frame of the high-speed eruption of Ascobolus immersus containing 8 spores (Yafetto et al., 2008).
The speed of spore launch is proportional to the magnitude of turgor pressure (Fischer et al., 2004).
Where U0 is the maximum possible spore velocity after launch, ∆pV is the work of the turgor pressure, ideally converted to kinetic energy, ρ is the density ~ 1.2 g/cm-3.
The ejection allows spores to reach dispersive air flows away from the parental fruiting body. Several adaptations enhance the range of ejection, including threadlike spore structures and aerodynamic spore casings.
Studies of asci design estimate the internal turgor pressure to be between 0.3 and 0.8 MPa (Fischer et al., 2004), returning an upper bound of spore velocity between 10–20 m·s−1 (Roper et al., 2008). However, this model does not consider the resistance of the spore on the asci, thus experimental values suggest the real figure is substantially lower. Nevertheless, mathematical models show that this initial velocity closer to 9 m·s−1 is enough to clear a few centimeters of still air, to reach dispersive airflows (Fischer et al., 2004).
Fig. 20. Modeling the projectile motion of asci type spores (Fischer et al., 2004).
Conclusion
Fungi are a diverse group of organisms that are found surviving and thriving all over the world. Their interactions with other organisms and surroundings are critical for the earth's ecosystem. However, most importantly, fungi are problem solvers.
Firstly, they adopt different shapes and structures to solve their main problem: lack of mobility. They do not possess legs or wing structures so they must take a different approach to dispersion, movement, and nutrient search. For instance, Bird’s Nest fungi utilize a nest shape and the “splash cup dispersal mechanism” to spread spores onto moist and favorable substrates. Similarly, the cell wall of fission yeast spores is so resilient that they can travel in the guts of the fruit fly to access nutrient rich environments. Moreover, the turgor pressure within yeast cells produces an expansion force that allows the cells to grow and pierce rigid substrates to find food. Finally, the rod shape of Schizosaccharomyces cells is energetically favorable and ensures access to the environment.
In addition to modifying their shapes, fungi use fascinating strategies in their respective habitats to find food. Saprotrophic interactions are used by most fungi around the world. This nutrition strategy is critical in the recycling of nutrients, highlighting the importance of fungi for their ecosystems. Other types of fungi, such as Mycorrhiza, form intimate symbiotic relationships with other organisms. These relationships can be incredibly complex, such as with the formation of Common Mycorrhizal Networks, where fungi act as conduits for the spread of nutrition for various plants. Conversely, fungi even hurt and harm other organisms in the name of survival. Ophiocordyceps Unilateralis slowly grows and feeds on live ant hosts, using their husks to spread. While the Arthrobotrys Oligospora ensnares and punctures roundworms to procure nutrition.
Finally, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota fungi face the contradiction between sedentary lifestyle and hyper specific growth environments. Ballistospores and asci are two different evolutionary answers to the question of dispersal and maximal reproductive success. To succeed in their niche, Dikarya have evolved microscopic structures within complex fruiting bodies that enable fungal parents to disperse vast quantities of genetically diverse spores. Using biological catapults and cannons, fungal evolution seeks the best chances for its offspring.
In short, fungi have found clever ways to persevere despite unfavorable conditions. These clever strategies reveal the genius of nature and the diversity of design solutions in the fungal kingdom. Their adaptations can inspire countless biological materials and machines. For instance, fungi could be used to clean dirt off solar panels. With the millions of fungi that have yet to be discovered, there is undoubtedly much more to learn from nature’s own bioengineers.
References
References
Armstrong, W. P. (2021). Bird's-Nest Fungus Update. Retrieved from https://www.waynesword.net/pljune96.htm
Brodie, H. (2011a). The splash-cup dispersal mechanism in plants. Canadian Journal of Botany, 29, 224-234. doi:10.1139/b51-022
Brodie, H. (2011b). Springboard plant dispersal mechanisms operated by rain. Canadian Journal of Botany, 33, 156-167. doi:10.1139/b55-011
Brodie, H. J. (1956). Raindrops as plant dispersal agents. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science.
Brodie, H. (1975). The Bird's Nest Fungi. Toronto, CANADA: University of Toronto Press
Hassett, M. O., Fischer, M. W. F., Sugawara, Z. T., Stolze-Rybczynski, J., & Money, N. P. (2013). Splash and grab: Biomechanics of peridiole ejection and function of the funicular cord in bird's nest fungi. Fungal Biology, 117(10), 708-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2013.07.008
Wicklow, D. T., Langie, R., Crabtree, S., & Detroy, R. W. (1984). Degradation of lignocellulose in wheat straw versus hardwood by Cyathus and related species (Nidulariaceae). Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 30(5), 632-636. doi:10.1139/m84-093
Money, N. P. (2008). Insights on the mechanics of hyphal growth. Fungal Biology Reviews, 22(2), 71-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2008.05.002
Hibbett, D. S. (2007). After the gold rush, or before the flood? Evolutionary morphology of mushroom-forming fungi (Agaricomycetes) in the early 21st century. Mycological Research, 111(9), 1001-1018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.01.012
Seelan, J. S. S., Justo, A., Nagy, L. G., Grand, E. A., Redhead, S. A., & Hibbett, D. (2015). Phylogenetic relationships and morphological evolution in Lentinus, Polyporellus and Neofavolus, emphasizing southeastern Asian taxa. Mycologia, 107(3), 460-474. doi:10.3852/14-084
Porter, D. L., & Naleway, S. E. (2022). Hyphal systems and their effect on the mechanical properties of fungal sporocarps. Acta Biomaterialia, 145, 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.011
Moore, D. (1998). Fungal morphogenesis: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, M., & Money, N. (2010). Why mushrooms form gills: efficiency of the lamellate morphology. Fungal Biology, 114, 57-63. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2009.10.006
Coluccio, A. E., Rodriguez, R. K., Kernan, M. J., & Neiman, A. M. (2008). The yeast spore wall enables spores to survive passage through the digestive tract of drosophila. PLoS ONE, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002873
Chihaya, Y., Matsukawa, K., Mizushima, S., & Matsui, Y. (1988). Ruminant forestomach and abomasal mucormycosis under rumen acidosis. Veterinary pathology, 25(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/030098588802500203
Money, N. P. (1997). Wishful thinking of turgor revisited: The Mechanics of Fungal Growth. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 21(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1006/fgbi.1997.0976
Chang, F., & Huang, K. C. (2014). How and why cells grow as rods. BMC biology, 12, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-014-0054-8
Smith, M., Bruhn, J. & Anderson, J. (1992). The fungus Armillaria bulbosa is among the largest and oldest living organisms. Nature. 356. 428–431 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/356428a0
Bielcik, M., Aguilar Trigueros, C., Lakovic, M., Jeltsch, F., & Rillig, M. (2019). The role of active movement in fungal ecology and community assembly. Movement Ecology, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0180-6
Bonazzi, D., Julien, J. D., Romao, M., Seddiki, R., Piel, M., Boudaoud, A., & Minc, N. (2014). Symmetry breaking in spore germination relies on an interplay between polar cap stability and spore wall mechanics. Dev Cell, 28(5), 534-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.023
Brand, A., & Gow, N. A. (2009). Mechanisms of hypha orientation of fungi. Curr Opin Microbiol, 12(4), 350-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2009.05.007
Bronkhorst, J., Kots, K., de Jong, D., Kasteel, M., van Boxmeer, T., Joemmanbaks, T., Govers, F., van der Gucht, J., Ketelaar, T., & Sprakel, J. (2022). An actin mechanostat ensures hyphal tip sharpness in Phytophthora infestans to achieve host penetration. Sci Adv, 8(23), eabo0875. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo0875
César, E., Canche-Escamilla, G., Montoya, L., Ramos, A., Duarte-Aranda, S., & Bandala, V. M. (2021). Characterization and Physical Properties of Mycelium Films Obtained from Wild Fungi: Natural Materials for Potential Biotechnological Applications. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 29(12), 4098-4105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02178-3
Chang, F. (2017). Forces that shape fission yeast cells. Mol Biol Cell, 28(14), 1819-1824. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-09-0671
Evans, H. C., Elliot, S. L., & Hughes, D. P. (2011). Hidden diversity behind the zombie-ant fungus Ophiocordyceps unilateralis: Four new species described from carpenter ants in Minas Gerais, Brazil. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e17024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017024
Fischer, M., Cox, J., Davis, D. J., Wagner, A., Taylor, R., Huerta, A. J., & Money, N. P. (2004). New information on the mechanism of forcible ascospore discharge from Ascobolus immersus. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 41(7), 698-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2004.03.005
Garcia-Rubio, R., de Oliveira, H. C., Rivera, J., & Trevijano-Contador, N. (2019). The Fungal Cell Wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus Species. Front Microbiol, 10, 2993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02993
Iapichino, M., Wang, Y. W., Gentry, S., Pringle, A., & Seminara, A. (2021). A precise relationship among Buller's drop, ballistospore, and gill morphologies enables maximum packing of spores within gilled mushrooms. Mycologia, 113(2), 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2020.1823175
Kavanagh, K. (2005). Fungi: Biology and Applications. 1-267. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470015330
Liu, F., Chavez, R. L., Patek, S. N., Pringle, A., Feng, J. J., & Chen, C. H. (2017). Asymmetric drop coalescence launches fungal ballistospores with directionality. J R Soc Interface, 14(132). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0083
Minc, N., Boudaoud, A., & Chang, F. (2009). Mechanical Forces of Fission Yeast Growth. Current Biology, 19(13), 1096-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.031
Money, N. P. (1998). Mechanics of Invasive Fungal Growth and the Significance of Turgor in Plant Infection. In K. Kohmoto & O. C. Yoder (Eds.), Molecular Genetics of Host-Specific Toxins in Plant Disease: Proceedings of the 3rd Tottori International Symposium on Host-Specific Toxins, Daisen, Tottori, Japan, August 24–29, 1997 (pp. 261-271). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5218-1_29
Money, N. P. (2008). Insights on the mechanics of hyphal growth. Fungal Biology Reviews, 22(2), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2008.05.002
Moore, D., Robson, G. D., & Trinci, A. P. J. (2021). 21st century guidebook to fungi (2nd ed.).
https://www.davidmoore.org.uk/21st_century_guidebook_to_fungi_platinum/
Müller, T., Bronkhorst, J., Müller, J., Safari, N., Hahn, M., Sprakel, J., & Scheuring, D. (2024). Plant infection by the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis requires actin-dependent generation of high invasive turgor pressure. New Phytologist, 244(1), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20025
Nagy, L. G., Tóth, R., Kiss, E., Slot, J., Gácser, A., & Kovács, G. M. (2017). Six Key Traits of Fungi: Their Evolutionary Origins and Genetic Bases. Microbiol Spectr, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0036-2016
Naranjo-Ortiz, M. A., & Gabaldón, T. (2019). Fungal evolution: major ecological adaptations and evolutionary transitions. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 94(4), 1443-1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12510
Noblin, X., Yang, S., & Dumais, J. (2009). Surface tension propulsion of fungal spores. J Exp Biol, 212(17), 2835-2843. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.029975
Porter, D. L., & Naleway, S. E. (2022). Hyphal systems and their effect on the mechanical properties of fungal sporocarps. Acta Biomaterialia, 145, 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.011
Pringle, A., Patek, S. N., Fischer, M., Stolze, J., & Money, N. P. (2005). The captured launch of a ballistospore. Mycologia, 97(4), 866-871. https://doi.org/10.3852/mycologia.97.4.866
Roper, M., Pepper, R. E., Brenner, M. P., & Pringle, A. (2008). Explosively launched spores of ascomycete fungi have drag-minimizing shapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 105(52), 20583-20588. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805017105
Roper, M., & Seminara, A. (2019). Mycofluidics: The Fluid Mechanics of Fungal Adaptation. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 51(Volume 51, 2019), 511-538. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045308
Stolze-Rybczynski, J., Cui, Y., Stevens, H., Davis, D., Fischer, M., & Money, N. (2009). Adaptation of the spore discharge mechanism in the Basidiomycota. PloS One, 4(1), e4163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004163
Sigoillot, J.-C., Berrin, J.-G., Bey, M., Lesage-Meessen, L., Levasseur, A., Lomascolo, A., Record, E., & Uzan-Boukhris, E. (2012). Chapter 8 - Fungal Strategies for Lignin Degradation. In L. Jouanin & C. Lapierre (Eds.), Advances in Botanical Research (Vol. 61, pp. 263-308). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416023-1.00008-2
Yafetto, L., Carroll, L., Cui, Y., Davis, D. J., Fischer, M. W. F., Henterly, A. C., Kessler, J. D., Kilroy, H. A., Shidler, J. B., Stolze-Rybczynski, J. L., Sugawara, Z., & Money, N. P. (2008). The Fastest Flights in Nature: High-Speed Spore Discharge Mechanisms among Fungi. PLOS ONE, 3(9), e3237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003237
Wu, B., Hussain, M., Zhang, W., Stadler, M., Liu, X., & Xiang, M. (2019b, May 7). Current insights into fungal species diversity and perspective on naming the environmental DNA sequences of fungi. Mycology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6691916/
Khadempour, L., Burnum-Johnson, K. E., Baker, E. S., Nicora, C. D., Webb-Robertson, B.-J. M., White, R. A., Monroe, M. E., Huang, E. L., Smith, R. D., & Currie, C. R. (2016, November). The fungal cultivar of leaf-cutter ants produces specific enzymes in response to different plant substrates. Molecular ecology. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5118115/
Bahram, M., & Netherway, T. (2022, March 3). Fungi as mediators linking organisms and Ecosystems. FEMS microbiology reviews. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892540/
Eastwood, D. (2014). Evolution of fungal wood decay. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286853159_Evolution_of_Fungal_Wood_Decay
McDougall, G., Yu, R., Wang, M., & Shin, J. (2021). The mechanics and rates of organic matter decomposition. Bioengineering Hyperbook. https://bioengineering.hyperbook.mcgill.ca/the-mechanics-and-rates-of-organic-matter-decomposition/
Tatum, G. A. (2024). A Characterization of Fungal Degradation Effects on Wood Structures: Multi-scale Model of Decayed Wood from the Polymer to Structural Scales [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1713361312888139
Lamb, B. C. (2001). Ascobolus. In S. Maloy & K. Hughes (Eds.), Brenner's Encyclopedia of Genetics (2nd ed., pp. 204-205). Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012374984-0.00098-X
Malloch, D. (2011). How fungi work. How Fungi Work. http://website.nbm-mnb.ca/mycologywebpages/NaturalHistoryOfFungi/Physiology.html
Winandy, J. E., & Morrell, J. J. (1978). Relationship between incipient decay, strength, and chemical composition of Douglas-Fir Heartwood. Wood and Fiber Science. https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/858
Image of Brown Rot from BOLDSYSTEMS, Meruliporia incrassata. https://v3.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=561779 ( HYPERLINK for figure 10)
Dunn, B., Leckie, R., & Singh, H. (2017, April 1). Mycorrhizal fungi - Oklahoma State University. Mycorrhizal Fungi | Oklahoma State University. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/mycorrhizal-fungi.html#:~:text=In%20total%2C%20mycorrhizal%20fungi%20benefit,%2C%20rhododendron%2C%20sedge%20and%20spinach.
U.S. Department of the Interior. (2018). Lichen. National Parks Service. https://www.nps.gov/articles/lichen-and-our-air.htm
Figueiredo, A. F., Boy, J., & Guggenberger, G. (2021, August 23). Common mycorrhizae network: A review of the theories and mechanisms behind underground interactions. Frontiers. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/fungal-biology/articles/10.3389/ffunb.2021.735299/full
Petruzzello, M. (2024, September 23). zombie-ant fungus. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/zombie-ant-fungus
Ahmadjian, V. , Alexopoulos, C. J. & Moore, D. (2024, October 7). fungus. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/fungus
Gurudev, S. (2023, December 12). Meet the fungus that can transform into a carnivorous predator. Environment. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/worm-eating-fungus-predator-nematodes
Virágh, M., Merényi, Z., Csernetics, Á., Földi, C., Sahu, N., Liu, X.-B., Hibbett, D. S., & Nagy, L. G. (2022). Evolutionary Morphogenesis of Sexual Fruiting Bodies in Basidiomycota: Toward a New Evo-Devo Synthesis. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 86(1), e0001921. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00019-21
Beiler, K. J., Simard, S. W., & Durall, D. M. (2015). Topology of tree–mycorrhizal fungus interaction networks in xeric and mesic Douglas-fir forests. Journal of Ecology, 103(3), 616–628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12387