Subscribe to the OSS Weekly Newsletter!

Register for the OSS 25th Anniversary Event

Meet Science Mom, Natalie Newell

I grew up with my own parents approaching the world in what, looking back, was a rational, evidence-based manner. My mom, who worked for many years as a nurse, would look at me in disbelief when I told her about some of the unsolicited advice I received about food and medicine as it pertained to her grandchildren. I wasn’t a big reader of parenting blogs, because I felt like that corner of the internet was like the Wild West of misinformation, so, as a parent, I felt grateful for my mom’s rational viewpoints and for the (vocally pro-vaccine) pediatric practice that’s cared for my children since they were born.

“Have you considered a delayed vaccine schedule?”

“I think the school should serve only organic food.”

“Stay away from GMOs.”

“You should take your son to a chiropractor.”

 

These are just a few examples of things that people said to me, either in the context of having my own children or when I was working as the director of a small private school. These are the kind of statements and questions that I heard, processed, sometimes mulled over, wondering if there was something I was missing. Maybe I wasn’t worrying enough?

I grew up with my own parents approaching the world in what, looking back, was a rational, evidence-based manner. My mom, who worked for many years as a nurse, would look at me in disbelief when I told her about some of the unsolicited advice I received about food and medicine as it pertained to her grandchildren. I wasn’t a big reader of parenting blogs, because I felt like that corner of the internet was like the Wild West of misinformation, so, as a parent, I felt grateful for my mom’s rational viewpoints and for the (vocally pro-vaccine) pediatric practice that’s cared for my children since they were born.

I had one exception to my “no mommy blogs” rule. Grounded Parents. A parenting blog with a skeptical tilt was exactly what I needed from time to time, to make me feel like there were other parents out there who saw the world through a similar lens as I did. And then one night, while I was feeding Zeke at some ridiculous time of night, inspiration hit. I stumbled upon the “Moms4GMOs” open letter, in which the women who would later become the stars of “Science Moms” took a stand for facts over fear in the face of celebrity-centered, myth-driven campaigns about food. It’s like it was my “Eureka!” moment, because it felt so refreshing to see this potential new parenting narrative - one of facts over fear, science over myths.

So I decided, in that moment, that I wanted to make a film. I needed to make “Science Moms.” Of course, a lot happened between the time the idea hit and the time the film first played in front of audiences in Manchester and Las Vegas in October 2017 (and this is supposed to be a short article). But I think I could sum up what this project is by sharing the note I wrote to myself (and immediately shared with the Science Moms) during a quiet moment after the Vegas premiere: I now see this film as a catalyst to help people feel empowered to have conversations about topics they’ve been silent about. The hope is that people will realize that they’re not alone in not wanting to give into the fear and hype around things like vaccines, GMOs, and other pseudoscience that’s invaded the culture of parenting.

And so here’s hoping that Science Moms can help shift the parenting narrative towards critical thinking and evidence, and away from fear and misinformation.

@ncnewell


Natalie will be at McGill on Monday, March 26, 8pm, for a screening of "Science Moms" followed by a panel discussion. To find out more about the event, click here.


Want to engage with this content? Comment on this article on our Facebook Page!

Back to top